Federalists' Debate: James vs. Dachuxing

James:

I must first say that I welcome all constructive feedback and criticism from all, as you correctly put it, that our organizational construct is that of a horizontal plain, and not of a pyramid shape. And one wins majority of support only through rational persuasion, not coercion, and it is in this spirit I wish to put forward the following dialectics to thy scrutiny.

"Your actions are treacherous to your own people. In the end, such treachery is self-destructive, as Westerners will never view freedom-supporting Chinese as their equal." ---- James.

To address the above inference I must confide to all that it is such a regrettable outcome that James has obtained a misunderstanding of my position. And so I have to Re-re-reiterate that it is only due to my Confucian faith (confer. 三纲五常) that entails all my action, which is all justifiable. I must also lament that it is very unfortunate that James has beget a dogged vision of not only my true intention but also toward Western Democracy. As I am a patriotic Chinese and a Freedom loving responsible citizen of a democratic institution, which I believe has retain the dispensation of a Manifest Destiny to be spread around the whole globe, it is my DUTY ( 义-causal action of Morality) that I shall help my fellow compatriots to obtain their equal share of such blessing, and be free, ONE DAY, from Communist Tyranny.

And since James has failed to provide detailed enumerations as to what are the specific actions that is objectionable to him, I am confounded at this point, if he wishes to put forward a specific case, I am ready to give my defense in due course.

"An attack on the body of the People's Republic of China is an attack towards 1.3 billion Chinese." ---- James.

James, since you're raised in the West you should be competent enough to differentiate the difference between Nation and State. (although both translates into Chinese as 国, which is unfortunately but inevitably misleading and confusing). It shall be reckoned by all that I am waging a relentless campaign of opposition against the latter, NOT the former, of which I maintain a deep faith and love, and thereby am proud to be called a "nationalist", a patriot, but not a statist. ( The detail explanation of which has been laid out in my thesis Patriotism vs. Statism. ) I am re-re-reiterating here, once again, I am attacking the PRC as a communist party dictatorial institution (little more than 50 yr old) and by default, ipso facto the Party itself , and it DOES NOT constitute as an attack on the 1.3 billion strong Chinese Nation ( 5000 yr old) , which is quite a totally disparate concept. The Communists are voluntarily confusing the two concepts in their propaganda ministry in order to sustain their dictatorship by continuing practicing obscurantism to their people ( which is more of a treachery and a tragedy), we have to establish a premise of such stark different entity.

In the light of the above rationale, I can even lead your thoughts to a form of syllogism (A-B-C) by postulating that even BOYCOTTING Beijing Olympics is a form of ad hoc PATRIOTISM, however, for the sake a brevity, I shall adjourn my defense to the next session.

Thanks, James.